Friday, September 4, 2009

Some Economic Perspective

TW: Economic history is intriguing. Hundreds of years ago things were far more simple if not affluent. As a someone who has spent time in the beer industry, I was aware of the heritage of beer and other alcohol as a sanitary alternative to other beverages of the time (i.e. water) due to the brewing process which killed off many of the prevalent germs.

From Economist:
" 'Tea reached Europe from China in 1606, spreading to France in 1630, and finally to England in 1650...Coffee spread through the Middle East and arrived in Europe in 1615. Sugar, available before 1500 in limited quantities, only became affordable once production centres developed in the Caribbean starting in the mid 17th century.

By the end of the period, sugar, coffee, and tea constituted 7.2% of an average English household’s budget, and roughly 10% of their food expenditure...To put this in perspective, personal consumption expenditure on personal computers in the US in 2004 was only 0.6% of consumption expenditure, meaning that, by at least one metric, the average Englishman valued sugar more than the average American values his or her computer...

Prior to 1700, the average European consumed 182 kg of bread and 182 litres of beer per year...Half of all spending was on beer and bread, and fully three-quarters of all calories came from these two sources alone. The reason for massive beer consumption was simple – water was often contaminated. This was especially true in the cities. Brewed beer was safe. It is hence not surprising that it was consumed throughout the day, often with breakfast, and in all forms – including as beer soup in the morning...

Minivans, satellite TV, the internet, and mobile phones have made life better. The single biggest addition to welfare comes from the introduction of personal computers, credited by Greenwood and Kopecky with a gain of 3.5-4% of consumption expenditure. Compared to these figures, the gains for coffee, tea, and sugar look very large.'

It is difficult to imagine what the first taste of sugar or coffee must have been like to those accustomed to weak beer and bread. One almost feels envious of the experience. As remarkable as current consumption options are, their entry into what is already a very rich consumer marketplace means that few items generate a truly dramatic positive shock."
http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2009/09/economic_history_finding_of_th.cfm

No comments: