Showing posts with label Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trump. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 30, 2020

So About Last Night....

 


This likely and succinctly summed up most viewers perspective.  Someone on twitter had stated earlier in the day that debating Trump was going to be like "trying to play Carnegie Hall while someone in the front row was blasting an air horn". So it was. Most of us ended up with this feeling...

An actual United States sitting president is called a clown and asked to "just shut up man" by his opponent and it gets practically lost in the cacophony.  This is not normal but it is embarrassing for our country.


And from the Japanese news channel this morning: 

But net net, Trump is behind.  He needed a win which he did not attain.

Ultimately Republican candidates woke up left between a rock (the Trump base) and a hard place this guy...


Actually we all know folks like Trump in some form or another and they really are not attractive.  So while I do believe the possibility outlined here is real...


I still hope the ultimate voting will leave little room for any craziness on the part of Trump and his most devoted adherents.  As I told a friend, I woke this morning sadder for my country than I was 24 hours ago but more confident than I was 24 hours ago that Biden was going to win.  After all he did not drool, he did not appear addled, he did not commit a gaffe and at times despite the constant heckling he actually looked into the camera at the American people and said in short "it does not have to be this way, let's get back to a normal presidency".  

A Trumpkin on FB wrote a while back he was pained by the notion that- "Many people I know and love are ashamed of AMERICA". He is wrong, we are not ashamed of America. Neither he nor Trump are America. We will not cede "America" to Trump. We are all part of the beautiful American tapestry and seek to integrate constructively many more people regardless of race, creed, tribe etc. It is a messy process and has been for over 200 years. Our history is portrayed more hagiographically than most understand, this too shall pass.

We need to get back closer to the U.S.A not some form of a D.S.A. (divided states of America) which some appear to seek.  That the question below needed to be asked is sad, the answer even more so.  


The Proud Boys and several of their adherents are not constructive for our beautiful tapestry.  Biden condemns violence without equivocation, for whatever reason Trump will not.  Let there be no doubt who he refuses to condemn.


So again let's make this happen and get the good ole US of A back on a proper path else well I guess there is always this...


ps just kidding I would never leave but would stay and fight 😀



Tuesday, September 29, 2020

The Penguin Sure Sounds....

...like someone we know...Happy Debate Day everyone...

Sunday, September 27, 2020

Trump Taxes: This List Seems Pretty Complete

Most sentient humans know Trump has fought the release of his tax returns due to the stench contained therein.  The same humans realize for Trump acolytes the stench will go in one nostril and out the next without registering the slightest odor. 






 

Thursday, August 13, 2020

How He Does It

Certainly it has been frustrating for many of us to watch a person we regard as personally foul and politically despicable gain office and then continue to hold the fawning loyalty of too many.  One thing I have mentioned to friends over the past few years is the one clear skill I give him credit for which is he understands PR and he is a highly effective carnival barker.  The way by which Trump communicates is central to his success.  The Economist breaks down his syntax.  His use of phrases reflects several of his core communication tenets which make him quite effective (or perhaps more descriptively dangerous).

1) He simplifies complex issues into soundbites (MAGA is an example and regardless of what one thinks of him or its implications it will go down as an historically impactful slogan)

2) He exhibits supreme and unwavering self-confidence and self-belief

3) He NEVER admits error

4) He always acts with a swagger that enraptures his supporters

If one had read much history and steps back to think of those leaders in the past who have used these techniques some pretty scary examples come to mind...

From the Economist:

"His linguistic quirks reveal the salesmanship that has made his career"

“Underpinning Mr Trump’s distinctive language is an extreme confidence in his own knowledge..Mr Trump creates his own “reality distortion field”. One of his signature tropes is “not a lot of people know…” He has introduced the complicated nature of health care, or the fact that Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican president, as truths that are familiar only to a few. A related sound-bite is “nobody knows more about...than I do”. The fields of expertise Mr Trump has touted this way include campaign finance, technology, politicians, taxes, debt, infrastructure, the environment and the economy.

His critics have often attributed this to narcissism, but a complementary explanation is that it is also one of his strengths—salesmanship. In Mr Trump’s framing, he is in possession of rare information. He is therefore able to cut a customer a special deal “not a lot of people know” about. Should you be tempted to take your business to a competitor, he will remind you that “nobody knows more about” what is on offer than he does.

And how does he convince listeners he really does know what he’s talking about? His language constantly indicates self-belief. …Mr Trump rarely hesitates and hardly ever says “um” or “uh”. When he needs to plan his next sentence—as everyone must—he often buys time by repeating himself. This reinforces the impression that he is supremely confident and that what he’s saying is self-evident.

Perhaps the most striking element of Mr Trump’s uncompromising belief in his sales technique can be glimpsed in an unusual place: his mistakes. Mr Trump is often presented as a linguistic klutz, saying things that make so little sense that his detractors present them as proof of major cognitive decline.

All people make some slips and stumbles…Mr Trump regularly makes errors but his signature quality, by contrast, is to lean into them. Take a recent interview with Fox News, in which he talked about governors’ differing attitudes towards masks. Some are keener than others about requiring people to wear them to slow the spread of the coronavirus. Or, as Mr Trump put it, “they’re more mask into”.

What is remarkable is not the mistake. It is easy for anyone to go down a syntactic blind alley. Many people will say something like “they’re more mask” and then realise there is nowhere to go. The sentence, in linguists’ terms, requires “repair”, which usually involves backtracking. Unless, that is, you are Mr Trump, in which case you confidently intone “into” and move on, giving no hint of trouble.

This refusal to concede blunders shows up in more serious ways, of course, such as the president’s unwillingness to take responsibility for his administration’s missteps during the pandemic. It also helps explain two mysteries. The first is the odd disjunct between words that seem nonsensical on the page and a stage presence that enraptures audiences—it is Mr Trump’s assertive persona that convinces more than his words.

The second is how this works on his fans. In a recent survey conducted by Pew, Americans were asked to rank Mr Trump and Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, on a number of characteristics. The trait for which Americans give Mr Trump the highest mark is telling. Despite a notably light schedule and a stated disdain for exercise, the president’s incessant speaking style is almost certainly the reason he received a good score on one quality in particular: 56% of voters, and 93% of his supporters, describe him as “energetic”.

https://www.economist.com/books-and-arts/2020/08/08/donald-trumps-language-offers-insight-into-how-he-won-the-presidency

Monday, August 3, 2020

The Republicans Are Trapped in an Orange Box

Back in October 2016 just after the release of the "grab her by the pussy" tape, Ms. Blogger asked how could the Republican party politicians stick with a person like Trump.  I responded because he has a strangle hold on the Republican base.  I was right and he still does, arguably now even more so.  

We have all encountered the Trumpian tribe via friends, family or social media.  Deep into his one term presidency, Trump has pursued an unwavering strategy of stoking the resentment and grievance which energize this tribe.  The tribe appears utterly resolute in its loyalty at this point.  I see decreasing efforts on tribal or non-tribal members to engage at this point.  We all appear to have settled into a mutual disdain.  I have no doubt that Trump could literally do as he bragged and shoot someone and his tribe would not waver.  The opinions of the non-tribal members especially someone like say me are not only not of interest but vociferously resented.

That said I mention his one-term presidency as I firmly believe (putting aside voter suppression and who knows what other chicanery may emerge around the election) that Trump is steering his party into a box with no exit door.  It is no more complex than a feverish base comprising 30% of the electorate can dominate primaries and even drive our national government (whilst abetted by cynical allies) but ultimately in a remotely fair general contest 30% is not sufficient.  As the following article covers, there is no room in the current iteration the Trumpian party for dissent else its adherents will tune out or turn on the less slavish Republicans leaving them in no mans land electorally.

From Rolling Stone:

"…while pockets of Republican resistance have roasted Dear Leader, elected officials in D.C. and...the consultant class have remained steadfast…

These swamp creatures were never the biggest Trumpers in the first place…So why, as Trump’s numbers plummet, are these establishment RINOs continuing...to protect someone who is politically faltering...

 I reached out to…former allies and rivals who still consult for Republican candidates at the highest levels of Senate and House races... I asked them to speak candidly…How is the president’s performance impacting their candidate?...And finally, why in the hell aren’t they more pissed at this incompetent…

 …their answers were one part Stockholm Syndrome, one part survival instinct. They all may not love the president, but most share his loathing for his enemies on the left, in the media, and the apostate Never Trump Republicans with a passion that engenders an alliance with the president, if not a kinship. And even among those who don’t share the tribalistic hatreds, they perceive a political reality driven by base voters and the president’s shitposting that simply does not allow for dissent…

…in 2006, Republican candidates could strategically distance themselves from an unpopular president without facing a mutiny within the ranks. That won’t work in 2020…“There are practical realities — we ran a bunch of red district primaries, and it would come back that the number one issue for 80+% of Republican primary voters was loyalty to Donald Trump. I’m not making that number up,” a respondent told me.

 Several consultants pointed to the situation that Sen. John Cornyn faces in Texas to illustrate the problem. They indicated that internal polling shows Trump either tied or very slightly ahead in the Lone Star State…Cornyn’s “quietly in trouble.” But rather than addressing this by creating some strategic separation from Trump to solidify the historically conservative Dallas and Houston suburbs where Trump is bleeding out, Cornyn has become a Mr. Trump fan girl, echoing his virus denial and defending the attack on nonviolent protestors in Lafayette Square.

Why? According to one: “You have 25% of the state is rural and Trump gets like Saddam Hussein level numbers here. 87% in 25% of the state…

This same calculus pervades no matter the race, no matter the district, no matter the geography: The operatives insist that the pro-Trump zealotry the president’s supporters demand makes it far more difficult for candidates to win over anyone else…

…The idea of separating from Trump is so verboten in GOP circles that the best consultants won’t even talk about talking about doing it in mixed company, for fear of being stigmatized, and thus losing potential client work on other campaigns.

…Trump “sucks the oxygen out of the room from every other candidate” to such a degree that you “can’t run independent of him,” as one put it.

…’We haven’t worked for anybody who seriously thinks the guy has it all together,” said one consultant.

But what I found was that, underneath that surface level eye-rolling at Trump and hat-tipping to the record on judges, there was an emotional alliance with the president that is deeper than they might let on in mixed company. A compartmentalization of the badness of the orange man, set aside in favor of a deep and visceral hatred of the president’s enemies…”


https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-reelection-chances-2020-house-senate-candidates-biden-1024862/

Saturday, August 1, 2020

Every Potus Must Have Grace- Bush Had It, They All Have Until Now


Certainly I (along with a few others I suspect) ponder why is Trump so awful.  Not awful like W. Bush's policies but like awful as a human being.  It strikes me that he lacks grace.

Grace has numerous definitions some religious some secular but sticking with the latter would include:

"to honor people by taking part in something"
"the quality of being pleasantly polite, or a willingness to be fair and honest"

W. Bush was an poor president because his policies were bad.  But the man has grace (and humor).  He exhibited both in his eulogy to the late John Lewis this week.


Many remarked at the grace displayed not only by Bush but several others at the Lewis service.  It is inconceivable that Trump would have done so.  In fact he could not even bring himself to honor Lewis by visiting his casket while it lay in the cupola at the Capital.

Every president going back at least as far as FDR had grace, even Nixon had it.  Grace is a requisite of leadership and we have become rightly accustomed to it from our presidents. It enables a partisan from one party to demonstrate empathy and respect for those from the other party.  It also is calming and a palliative in times of crisis and stress.

When it is absent as it is now, a void is created.  Partisanship worsens, stress increases and ultimately anger results.  We need, in fact must have. a president with grace.


Another point.  This photo was taken recently while Trump played catch with former Yankee closer Mariano Rivera.  It struck me because it is the first photo I recall in which Trump actually appeared to be enjoying himself and genuinely smiling.  Usually his smile is more of a sneer typically whilst denigrating someone or something.  So I would add another requisite- a Potus should possess joyfulness.  


Friday, July 24, 2020

When Friends and Family Embrace Trumpism...What to Do?

Short answer is I really do not know...

Have been following Bryan McGrath for maybe ten years so well back into the Obama years due to my own interest in national security issues.  He is a former naval officer that I believe makes a living consulting in that space.  He is a conservative of the traditional Reagan type (e.g. focused on national security and economic issues as opposed to cultural and anti-immigration stuff).  He is now a never-Trumper.

In his blog, while its headline purpose was criticizing yet another Trump self-serving pardon the part that caught my eye was him agonizing about his personal relationships in the age of Trump.

http://conservativewahoo.blogspot.com/2020/07/what-in-gods-name-are-they-thinking.html

"...The folks I used to huddle in the (metaphorical) foxhole with as we tried to get what I believed were principled conservatives and civilized human beings elected to the Presidency....people who turned their backs on integrity and honor in the pursuit of ephemeral political power, personal financial gain, or some combination thereof....are also uniformly silent. These are not reticent people, mind you. They are happy to speak out on what the view as Chinese perfidy, the hypocrisy of the NBA, or the Marxism of BLM (each of which by the way, they are correct about). But across the board, fear of Donald Trump and his incompressible base has rendered them limp, silent, feckless, and beside the point.

When I see them spouting off on social media about everything under the sun except the ONE BIG THING that they ignore, two things come to mind. One general, one personal.

First, I wonder if they realize how much damage they are doing to their own ability to be seen as competent and reliable voices of opposition when someone of the other party occupies the White House? They have so often surrendered the high ground to the man they've tied their fortunes to, that when the time comes for arguments to be made from it, they will not know where to go to find it. This is a serious point. Joe Biden and his team are going to have to be constrained from the right...but upon what principles will or can these people stand? Putting aside the emergency money voted as part of an economic rescue this year--this crowd silently assented as Trump knee-capped Paul Ryan and other voices calling for entitlement reform. When the inevitable call for increases in entitlement spending come, upon what arguments will they draw? Where will they find credibility? On free trade, they have willingly given the issue away. How can they reclaim it, in the light of 3.5 years of sliming it? Given the level of constant flat out corruption that they have enabled, how ever will they have the moral standing to point it out in others? 

The second thing I think about...is that I wonder what they think about me?... When these people see what I write, what do they think? Has my raving for four plus years convinced them that I am an unserious and unsophisticated person, that there is important work to be done and someone has to do it, that I am a naive waif who simply doesn't understand how the game is played? Have they long ago muted me so as a result? Has my constant reminder to them that not everyone turned their back on conscience and principle, caused them to question even one iota of their descent, or has it more likely caused them to tune me out as their self-image was strained? 

As I've written here before, I've lost friendships over all of this. There are some who consider this "sad", and an overreaction. They ask "why can't we all just get along?" and "is it really worth losing friends over?" My answer remains the same--my standards for friendship are so much higher than my standards for political affinity. You cannot be my friend if you shill for this, you cannot be my friend if you enable it, you cannot be my friend if you are so inconsistent as to repudiate core beliefs in pursuit of personal gain, you cannot be my friend if you defend the corruption and dishonesty and incivility and chaos. By doing so, you by definition do not possess the basic character necessary for being my friend.

...and I mean this with all sincerity...I hope it was worth it. I hope your time in the sun was all that you'd hoped it would be, and that when President Trump rides off into glory after his term is over, you are satisfied with what you have accomplished and the price you paid. I hope the hobbling of the GOP was worth it. I hope the reinforcement of the GOP as a white, racist party...was worth it. I hope your repudiation of 20th century American conservatism was worth it."

Me:
Strong words but ones with which I identify (excluding the fact I don't necessarily agree with him policy wise on many things although the three topics he mentioned China, NBA and China and BLM will perhaps make interesting things to write about soon enough).  I wrestle with this topic constantly.  I wonder if it is merely me becoming more strident with age or is it really that Trumpism (and it is far more than just Trump and on a future post I will warn about what I believe is coming next which will be even more dangerous).  But I do think some things are changing for the worse- Reaganism despite its popularity opened some troubling governance issues, W Bushism was far worse and Trumpism seems capable of crumbling some American edifices in ways we had thought impossible.  

I will leave it there for now but needless to say I feel McGrath's pain.